The year Larry King dated Angie Dickinson
Last Updated: 7:07 AM, July 18, 2010
Posted: 2:59 AM, July 18, 2010
Comments: 1
Phil MushnickAt a time when TV news folks are being laid off by the dozens, it becomes extra painful to see how local newscasts waste money.
Recently, the 11 p.m. edition of Ch. 7’s “Eyewitness News” reported Larry King’s planned retirement from CNN. Channel 7 dispatched a reporter and a crew to provide that story, live, from in front of CNN’s Manhattan headquarters.
This live, on-the-scene report came after 11 p.m. on a Tuesday. There didn’t appear to be much action within CNN’s HQ; it was pretty dark outside the building, as well. It stood to reason that there wouldn’t even be much foot traffic to be seen in the report, and there wasn’t.
So why not just report that story, with video, from the studio? Why did Ch. 7 send a reporter and crew to conduct a live stand-up from in front of CNN at 11:12 at night?
Why? Because that’s the way it has always been done; that’s why. No good reason, beyond habit. In TV, no bad idea is unworthy of duplication.
We’ve seen this hundreds of times. A crime is committed, and many, many hours — a day later, even — there’s a live report from the scene.
The scene? There is no scene. The scene is gone. The interview with the cops and/or the neighbors is on tape, from many hours earlier. There is no good reason for the reporter to be standing, live, reporting from the scene long after the scene had ceased to be one.
Why not spend the station’s shrinking resources pursuing something more worthwhile — some news, perhaps?
* * *
Speaking of Larry King and his planned retirement this fall, it seems as if everyone who has dealt with him has a favorite King story. Here’s one:
Years ago, after a 30-ish TV critic for a New York newspaper took a few swings at King in print, he wrote the columnist a nasty letter, attacking the writer’s newspaper.
The critic replied that he doesn’t hold King responsible for everything presented on the networks he works for, thus both should answer only for their own work.
Years later, King surprised that critic with a phone call. He complimented him for having had the nerve to stand up to him, years before, and, as a reward, he was going to give him a big news scoop. Would he like that?
“Sure; fire away,” said the TV columnist.
And here it was: He, Larry King, is dating Angie Dickinson.
* * *
There’s a Website, TVTango.com that shows what was scheduled on any date, birthdays, marriages, etc., since 1950.
For example, 35 years ago, today, CBS’s “Match Game ‘75,” hosted by Bert Convy, included these Always-Available Game Show Hall of Fame Celebrity Panelists: Brett Somers, Charles Nelson Reilly, Richard Dawson and Joyce Bulifant. (Bulifant’s previous claim to TV fame was the role of Marie, wife of Murray Slaughter, played by Gavin MacLeod, on “The Mary Tyler Moore Show.”)
Five years later, on this date, NBC from 10-11:30 a.m., aired “The David Letterman Show.” Five years after that — 25 years ago, today — from 12:35 a.m. to 1:35, NBC aired “Late Night With David Letterman.”
And what was lost to New Yorkers on July 13, 1977, the night of the disastrous New York City blackout?
On CBS, the rest of the country could have watched the “Marilyn McCoo and Billy Davis, Jr. Show” — the singing spouses from The Fifth Dimension — followed, on NBC, by Raymond Burr in “Kingston: Confidential,” a new series that went lights-out shortly after the lights came back on.
* * *
The Way the Wind Blows: Now that NBC/Universal owns the Weather Channel, it sure seems as if NBC News’ telecasts are eager to include weather stories in order to force-feature TWC reporters and visual and spoken references.
PostPics
Today in PicturesClick on Each Photo

Most Popular
- 'Romantic' night
- Mom claims Lady Gaga copied sexy act of late Staten Island teen collaborator
- Kiefer Sutherland makes wobbly Gaslight exit
- Derek Jeter puts Trump apartment up for sale
- Patti Stanger warns: Don't do jocks!
- Minka Kelly
- Celebrity photos: September 9, 2010
- Celebrity Photos: September 7, 2010
- Celebrities at Fashion's Night Out: The Show
- Celebrity Photos: September 8, 2010
- Koran burner has right to be stupid: Bloomy
- Orioles deliver rare Bronx beating to CC, Yankees
- Rape horror
- Lean, mean Khalid drops 40 lbs. - but stays all evil
- Iconic steel column returns to WTC
- Country Singer James Otto Hospitalized in Nashville Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:08:27 GMT
- Daily 411 Links: Halle Has a New Man, Jen Aniston to Play a Cougar Again Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:14:03 GMT
- Scariest Celebrity Dieters Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:23:22 GMT
- Top Model: Ramping Up the Runway Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:17:00 GMT
- Psych Plans Twin Peaks Episode Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:09:00 GMT



Comments (1)
Post Your CommentSidneyHFields
07/18/2010 12:25 PM
It's one thing to not like a particular live shot.
It's another to say that it wastes money without any proof.
Assuming all personnel are on the clock and not on OT (which these days is a total lock), doing a live shot in front of CNN at 11PM costs nothing more than doing a set piece or just running a self-contained video package.
If the reporter came back in-house to do the piece, then the crew would just be unpacking and futzing around until their out time. That might even be more unproductive.
And the live location - even where nothing is going on - is just another set...just another staging platform for a story. In that sense no different from being on set. Going to a live shot can add a little pacing and energy to a show. And it can give the control room crew a little breather.
Those are some of the reasons we do them.
As a reporter I had no problem with them.
As a producer I had no problem with them.
But want to know something really stupid that wastes time and money? The imbecilic policy some newspapers have of requiring a reporter to "set foot" in a place in order to justify a byline there.
I've got news for you. Readers think a byline is where a story is taking place. They have no clue and don't care whether a reporter actually set foot there.